Whole body fat: Content and distribution

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.04.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The use of MRI and MRS to assess body fat content in human subjects is reviewed.

  • The pros and cons of different MRI protocols to map body-fat are discussed.

  • 1H MRS is shown to be the best way to determine ectopic fat in muscle, liver and heart.

  • MRI is an excellent alternative for determining ectopic fat levels, especially in the pancreas.

  • The impact of MR on the role of body-fat on disease development is demonstrated.

Abstract

Obesity and its co-morbidities, including type II diabetes, insulin resistance and cardiovascular diseases, have become one of the biggest health issues of present times. The impact of obesity goes well beyond the individual and is so far-reaching that, if it continues unabated, it will cause havoc with the economies of most countries. In order to be able to fully understand the relationship between increased adiposity (obesity) and its co-morbidity, it has been necessary to develop proper methodology to accurately and reproducibly determine both body fat content and distribution, including ectopic fat depots. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Spectroscopy (MRS) have recently emerged as the gold-standard for accomplishing this task. Here, we will review the use of different MRI techniques currently being used to determine body fat content and distribution. We also discuss the pros and cons of MRS to determine ectopic fat depots in liver, muscle, pancreas and heart and compare these to emerging MRI techniques currently being put forward to create ectopic fat maps. Finally, we will discuss how MRI/MRS techniques are helping in changing the perception of what is healthy and what is normal and desirable body-fat content and distribution.

Introduction

Obesity has become one of the major health concerns of modern times. It is estimated that over 700 million people across the world are currently either overweight or obese [1]. In the UK alone, latest studies show that over 60% of the adult population is either overweight (with a body mass index (BMI) between 25–30 kg/m2) or obese (with a BMI between 30–40 kg/m2), while 30.3% of children (aged 2–15) are overweight or obese. This increase in body adiposity is closely associated with a number of non-communicable diseases, including type-2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disorders and some forms of cancer. Indeed, type-2 diabetes is today a major worldwide problem, with more than 346,000,000 diabetics across the planet and these figures may double by 2030 [1]. In some countries, levels of diabetes now affect over 20% of the adult population. The social and economic impact of the obesity pandemic, and its co-morbidities, cannot be overstated, and at this rate is likely to have a severe impact on healthcare provision in many economies [2].

Adipose tissue (or body-fat) is a multifaceted and complex organ [3]. Besides functioning as a system for excess energy deposition, protection from the cold and everyday hazards, adipose tissue produces an assortment of molecular messengers (adipokines), which influence a diverse array of functions, including appetite, fertility, neuronal development and plasticity, inflammatory responses, and the action of other hormones, including insulin [4]. Yet, despite these positive functions, a close association between excess body adiposity and the development of non-communicable diseases has been reported in many epidemiological studies [5]. Moreover, these associations are further strengthened if age and physical activity (or the lack of it) are included in the paradigm.

Detailed studies of adipose tissue content and distribution suggest that the latter plays an important part in these associations [6]. Indeed, a number of adipose-tissue related sub-phenotypes have now been identified, including ‘thin on the outside fat on the inside’ (TOFI) and ‘fat-fit’ subjects, which indicate the importance of having accurate and reproducible measurements of both the total body-fat and its distribution [7]. For example, in the case of TOFI, subjects with normal BMI (<24.9 kg/m2) but increased abdominal obesity, have increased risk of developing insulin resistance and type II diabetes, while the “fat-fit”, subjects with BMI > 30 kg/m2 appear metabolically normal despite their elevated body adiposity [8].

In order to understand these somehow paradoxical findings, it is important to get a better definition of the different concepts/words involved in many of these associations, including ‘adipose tissue’, ‘body-fat’ and ‘ectopic fat’. The use of the words ‘fat’ or ‘body-fat’ has become synonymous with obesity, and in general refers to the fat found immediately under the skin covering substantial parts of the surface of the body. Strictly speaking, this fat layer is actually ‘subcutaneous adipose tissue’ and is part of a larger organ: adipose tissue, which makes up a significant part of our bodies. Adipose tissue can also be found surrounding organs such as the liver, pancreas, kidneys and the heart, to some degree. It is also found in muscles and other areas of the body including part of the orbital cavities. All these fat depots, which in many instances are not in direct physical contact with each other, appear to work in a coordinated manner, and are normally referred to as ‘total adipose tissue’. Besides these fat depots, fat can also be accumulated within certain organs and tissue, including liver, pancreas, heart and muscle, and these deposits are technically known as ‘ectopic fat depots’. Some of these depots have recently been shown to be important independent risk factors for disease development and clearly deserve closer scrutiny if the underlying mechanism that underpins the associations between increased body adiposity is to be unravelled [9].

The need for an accurate and reproducible method to determine levels of different fat depots, including ectopic fat, has driven the scientific community to investigate the potential use of imaging technologies, including CT, magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy (MRI/MRS). Thus, in the last two decades MRI/MRS have become the gold-standard for such studies, especially as the scientific community moves into the post-genomic era and an understanding is sought of the gene-environment interactions that contribute to the determination of fat content and distribution in different subjects and their role in the reported gender and ethnic differences. With this in mind, we will review the use of MRI and MRS in the study of adipose tissue and ectopic fat and how these techniques are helping us to get a better understanding of the role of body fat not only in disease development, but also in the process of achieving optimal health.

Section snippets

Indirect methods for body-fat measurements

A number of techniques are currently available to assess body fat content. Indirect methods include: body-mass-index (BMI), skinfold anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance, underwater weighing, and body water dilution [10]. While there are pros and cons for all of these methodologies, the one thing they have in common is that they give little or no information concerning adipose tissue distribution. Moreover, most of these techniques are based on indirect measurements of either body water or

Ectopic fat

There is increasing interest in the potential role of ectopic fat in the development and impact of non-communicable disease. Ectopic, from Greek ektopos meaning out of position, refers to the storage of fat in non-adipose tissue depots such as skeletal muscle, liver, pancreas and heart. The mechanisms by which ectopic fat accumulates are not fully understood, but one theory, the so called ‘overflow hypothesis’, suggests that under some circumstances adipocytes may lose their ability to expand

Conclusion

In conclusion, MRI and MRS have become the gold-standards for assessing body fat content and distribution. A variety of MRI sequences and scanning protocols are currently in use to determine the total and regional quantities of adipose tissue in human volunteers. The results from these studies point to the importance of abdominal adiposity in the development of non-transmittable diseases, including insulin resistance and type II diabetes. Ectopic fat, especially in liver and pancreas, appears

Acknowledgements

All authors are grateful to the NIHR Biomedical Facility at Imperial College London for infrastructure support and the UK MRC for funding.

Glossary

BMI
Body Mass Index
Cho
Choline
Crtot
total Creatine
CSI
Chemical Shift Imaging
CT
Computer Tomography
ECG
Electrocardiogram
EMCL
Extra-MyoCellular Lipids
IHCL
Intra-HepatoCellular Lipid
IMAT
Intermuscular Adipose Tissue
IMCL
Intra-MyoCellular Lipids
IDEAL
Iterative Decomposition with Echo Asymmetry and Least squares estimation
IR
Invesion Recovery
L
Lumbar vertebra
ME
Multi-Echo
MRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRS
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
NAFLD
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
PCOS
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
PRESS

References (264)

  • W.T. Cefalu et al.

    Contribution of visceral fat mass to the insulin resistance of aging

    Metabolism

    (1995)
  • R. Nakai et al.

    Development of a high-precision image-processing automatic measurement system for MRI visceral fat images acquired using a binomial RF-excitation pulse

    Magn. Reson. Imag.

    (2010)
  • R. Vongsuvanh et al.

    Visceral adiposity index is not a predictor of liver histology in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

    J. Hepatol.

    (2012)
  • S.H. Morin et al.

    Incidental findings in healthy control research subjects using whole-body MRI

    Eur. J. Radiol.

    (2009)
  • D. Gallagher et al.

    Adipose tissue in muscle: a novel depot similar in size to visceral adipose tissue

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2005)
  • A. Bosy-Westphal et al.

    Contribution of individual organ mass loss to weight loss-associated decline in resting energy expenditure

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2009)
  • R. Ross et al.

    Sex differences in lean and adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging: anthropometric relationships

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (1994)
  • N. Abate et al.

    Prediction of total subcutaneous abdominal, intraperitoneal, and retroperitoneal adipose tissue masses in men by a single axial magnetic resonance imaging slice

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (1997)
  • W. Shen et al.

    Visceral adipose tissue: relations between single-slice areas and total volume

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2004)
  • E.W. Demerath et al.

    Approximation of total visceral adipose tissue with a single magnetic resonance image

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2007)
  • H. Kvist et al.

    Total and visceral adipose-tissue volumes derived from measurements with computed tomography in adult men and women: predictive equations

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (1988)
  • E. Bonora et al.

    Is it possible to derive a reliable estimate of human visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from simple anthropometric measurements?

    Metabolism

    (1995)
  • A.P. Goldstone et al.

    Resting metabolic rate, plasma leptin concentrations, leptin receptor expression, and adipose tissue measured by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in women with Prader-Willi syndrome

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2002)
  • K. Müssig et al.

    RARRES2, encoding the novel adipokine chemerin, is a genetic determinant of disproportionate regional body fat distribution: a comparative magnetic resonance imaging study

    Metabolism

    (2009)
  • U. Lim et al.

    Susceptibility variants for waist size in relation to abdominal, visceral, and hepatic adiposity in postmenopausal women

    J. Acad. Nutr. Diet.

    (2012)
  • T. Scully

    Diabetes in numbers

    Nature

    (2012)
  • A.D. Lopez et al.

    Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors

    (2006)
  • S. Cinti

    The adipose organ at a glance

    Dis. Model Mech.

    (2012)
  • N. Ouchi et al.

    Adipokines in inflammation and metabolic disease

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2011)
  • A.H. Berg et al.

    Adipose tissue, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease

    Circ. Res.

    (2005)
  • M.J. Müller et al.

    Beyond the body mass index: tracking body composition in the pathogenesis of obesity and the metabolic syndrome

    Obes. Rev.

    (2012)
  • E.L. Thomas et al.

    The missing risk: MRI and MRS phenotyping of abdominal adiposity and ectopic fat

    Obesity

    (2012)
  • G. O’Donovan et al.

    Fat distribution in men of different waist girth, fitness level and exercise habit

    Int. J. Obes.

    (2009)
  • J.P. Després

    Inflammation and cardiovascular disease: is abdominal obesity the missing link?

    Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord.

    (2003)
  • G. Williams et al.

    Obesity: Science to Practice

    (1999)
  • H. Kvist et al.

    Adipose tissue volume determinations in women by computed tomography: technical considerations

    Int. J. Obes.

    (1986)
  • M.F. Fuller et al.

    A study of the sites of adipose tissue loss by NMR imaging

  • M.A. Staten et al.

    Measurement of fat distribution by magnetic resonance imaging

    Invest. Radiol.

    (1989)
  • R. Ross et al.

    Adipose tissue volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in rats

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1991)
  • N. Mitsiopoulos et al.

    Cadaver validation of skeletal muscle measurement by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1998)
  • J. Kullberg et al.

    Whole-body T1 mapping improves the definition of adipose tissue: consequences for automated image analysis

    J. Magn. Reson. Imag.

    (2006 Aug)
  • J. Machann et al.

    Standardized assessment of whole body adipose tissue topography by MRI

    J. Magn. Reson. Imag.

    (2005 Apr)
  • A. Bosy-Westphal et al.

    Accuracy of bioelectrical impedance consumer devices for measurement of body composition in comparison to whole body magnetic resonance imaging and dual X-ray absorptiometry

    Obes. Facts

    (2008)
  • H.P. Müller et al.

    Quantification of human body fat tissue percentage by MRI

    NMR Biomed.

    (2011)
  • D. Wald et al.

    Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies

    J. Magn. Reson. Imag.

    (2012)
  • E.L. Thomas et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of total body fat

    J. Appl. Physiol.

    (1998)
  • H. Jones et al.

    Polycystic ovary syndrome with hyperandrogenism is characterized by an increased risk of hepatic steatosis compared to nonhyperandrogenic PCOS phenotypes and healthy controls, independent of obesity and insulin resistance

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.

    (2012)
  • L. Hayes et al.

    Do obese but metabolically normal women differ in intra-abdominal fat and physical activity levels from those with the expected metabolic abnormalities? A cross-sectional study

    B.M.C. Public Health.

    (2010)
  • P.D. McLaughlin et al.

    Quantitative whole-body MRI in familial partial lipodystrophy type 2: changes in adipose tissue distribution coincide with biochemical improvement

    Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (2012)
  • M. Tiikkainen et al.

    Liver-fat accumulation and insulin resistance in obese women with previous gestational diabetes

    Obes. Res.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text